Perspectives from ISB

Technological disruption is transforming industries at lightning speed, and understanding why some established companies adapt while others falter is a question that intrigues both business leaders and curious newcomers. Here’s a clear, human-centered explanation of the research and insights about this “hidden force” — stock market expectations — and how it shapes corporate adaptation  in the face of radical change.​

The Hidden Force: How Investors Shape Innovation

When new waves like artificial intelligence or renewable energy sweep through industries, companies face enormous choices: resist change, or reinvent themselves. While it’s easy to think that a company’s fate is all about visionary leaders or internal culture, research shows something more subtle is at play: how the stock market — investors, analysts, and shareholders — values each company.​

If investors fixate on short-term profits, wanting quick returns every quarter, companies often hesitate to invest in new or risky technologies. But when investors care more about long-term growth, companies get the breathing room to invest and innovate, even if it means lower profits today.​

What the Numbers Reveal

A huge study tracking more than 34,000 firms over three decades found:

  • Companies with shareholders focused on current profits slowed down their adoption of new technologies by about 10% each year.
  • When shareholders cared more about future growth, the same companies increased their tech adoption by about 5% annually.

This means the attitudes of investors don’t just observe innovation; they shape it. The fears and hopes of the market trickle into the boardroom and weigh on every high-stakes decision an executive makes.

The Boardroom Drama

Imagine a CEO proposing a bold new AI project to her board. The idea could reshape the business, but the costs are high, and the payoff could take years. Directors look anxious — should they risk disappointing the markets and seeing the stock price dip? Quarterly earnings are just around the corner, and investors are watching closely. The hidden question is: “Will Wall Street punish us if we bet on this technology?”

This emotional pressure is real. It’s why even the most sophisticated firms sometimes move slowly in the face of technological threat.​

Two Paths for Incumbents

Experts have long debated what determines whether big companies adapt or get stuck:

  • The Capability View: Big firms have deep resources, talent, and networks to turn disruption into opportunity.
  • The Inertia View: Success itself can be a trap — large size, routines, and a focus on the present can make companies slow and complacent.

Reality isn’t black and white. Stock market expectations — and the way boards channel these pressures — tilt the balance for each company.​

The Quiet Power of Governance

Corporate governance (how boards are structured, who sits on them, and how they oversee management) is where investor sentiment is either amplified or redirected:

  • Diverse boards are more likely to weigh future opportunities against short-term risks.
  • Long-term shareholders (like pension funds) give companies room to plan beyond the next quarter.
  • Executive incentives tied to long-term performance, not just quarterly results, foster innovation.​

Good governance doesn’t get rid of market pressure — it turns anxiety into forward-thinking action.

Stock Markets: Leash or Compass?

Not all companies are victims of “short-termism.” The firms that thrive are those that:

  • Build trust with investors through honest communication.
  • Create a believable vision of future growth.
  • Align internal and external expectations, making the market an ally in bold moves — not just a judge.
Lessons for Leaders and Investors
  • For Executives: The story you tell investors can shape your company’s freedom to innovate. Nurture a board that thinks beyond quarterly results.
  • For Investors: Your priorities directly influence the pace of innovation. Supporting growth-minded companies sends a signal that encourages technological progress across entire industries.
The Big Idea: Innovation Is a Market-Mediated Process

The takeaway is simple but powerful: Innovation isn’t only born in the lab or the boardroom — it’s also born in the market, wherever investor sentiment meets corporate strategy. When leaders, boards, and investors align on a long-term vision, companies don’t just adapt: they lead. The next time you read about an industry reshaped by technology, remember: the real drama starts with the expectations set on Wall Street.

Professor Anand Nandkumar
Author’s Bio:

Anand Nandkumar
Associate Professor, Strategy (On Leave)

He explores industry and firm level phenomena that influence innovation – the generation of new ideas and entrepreneurship – distribution and commercialization of new ideas. His research focuses on high technology industries such as pharmaceuticals, bio-technology and software, and it falls in between industrial organisation (IO), economics of technological change and strategy. Professor Anand current work in the innovation stream examines the effect of stronger IPR on different aspects of innovation such as the influence of stronger patents on long run incentives for innovation or the influence of stronger patents on the functioning of Markets for Technology (MFT). In the entrepreneurship stream, his current work examines the influence of venture capitalists on entrepreneurial performance.

Professor Anand graduated with a PhD in Public Policy and Management, with a focus in strategy and entrepreneurship from Carnegie Mellon University in 2008. Prior to his PhD, he worked for about 3 years with a start-up in the Silicon Valley and prior to that in New York City with one of the world’s largest financial services firm. True to his expertise, at the ISB, Professor Anand teaches Strategic Innovation Management and Strategic Challenges for Innovation based start-up’s.

Leave a Message

Registration isn't required.



By commenting you accept the Privacy Policy